
Dwain McFarland examines when wide receivers are at their prime, when they start to decline and ultimately when they fall off — and applies the results for 2024 fantasy drafts.

We are living in the WR era.
Every year, WRs are going earlier and earlier in fantasy drafts. The top 36 WRs are going 6.2 picks sooner than last year on Underdog.
While best ball has been the sparkplug igniting the meteoric rise of WRs, the phenomenon is spreading to other formats. In high-stakes drafts over at the FFPC, the WR36 is coming off the board by pick 74 — only six spots later than Underdog.
As a result of this trend, the strategy for selecting WRs has become more critical than ever. It's not just about choosing the best WRs and avoiding the underperformers. There are also significant opportunity costs to consider when compared to other positions. For instance, some fantasy football enthusiasts are opting for WRs like Cooper Kupp and Stefon Diggs over elite QBs such as Josh Allen, Jalen Hurts and Lamar Jackson.
I intentionally brought up Kupp and Diggs because they are two of seven WRs with at least four WR1 finishes on their resume that will be heading into their age 30-season or older. We have a lot of high-end WRs getting up there in age in 2024.
Given all of these factors, I decided to investigate the impact of WR age on fantasy performance.
This article will outline when WRs are at their prime, when they start to decline and ultimately when they fall off. Additionally, we will identify critical criteria that can help us discern which aging WRs might still have more to offer versus who we need to avoid. Finally, we will apply everything we learn to the aging WRs for the 2024 season.
To appropriately understand the magnitude of age in the WR performance equation, I decided to divide production at each age (20 to 40) by their prime production. Prime production equals the average fantasy points per game for a player's best three-year stretch in their career, and player ages were rounded based on their age on Week 1 for each season.
After compiling that data across every season where a WR had at least 200 routes from 2011 to 2023, we get a clear picture of when WRs are at their peak and when they begin to decline. For the sake of simplicity, buckets were created for age groups based on performance.
Data summary (remember ages are rounded):
Of course, as WRs age the risk of reduced production isn't the only factor at play. We must also consider how likely they are to reach a point where they are no longer viable options for our fantasy lineups. They could hit the dreaded cliff.
For this phase of the research, we will define a cliff season as one where the player falls below WR3 status (12 PPR points per game). While this might sound aggressive, we aren't winning fantasy championships with WR3s, much less WR4s, in normal-size leagues with typical starting lineup requirements.
As I began working through this data, it became apparent that this research would need to be divided into subgroups. So, we will analyze two different WR types: elite and good.
Data summary:
Data Summary:
OK, we understand the basic risk-reward profiles for aging WRs based on age and subgroup. But you are probably asking yourself: Are there other indicators that can help us better understand if the cliff is near?
And that is a great question, especially considering the near coin-flip odds we saw for elite WRs posting another WR1 finish versus a WR4 dud. If we find a way to de-risk some of the downside, those could become profitable profiles for us to target when ADP (average draft position) cooperates.
To answer this question, we need to know which data points are most predictive of future fantasy production. Of course, we will need to factor in age to get this right.
The minimum route thresholds were increased from 200 to 350 for this activity because I wanted to include man and zone splits based on a great thread from Jacob Gibbs a couple of weeks back that caught my attention.
While all the stats lose predictive power for age-30-plus WRs, it is interesting to note that air yards, man air yards and man YPRR climb into the top eight. We will get more into that in the section below as we analyze the aging 2024 WRs, but for now we will focus on the fact that PPR points per game were clearly the most predictive for future fantasy points from one season to the next.
With that in mind, I analyzed the data for points-per-game trends season over season. Based on the data, cliff-seasons were grouped into categories.
Data summary:
Now that we understand some of the warning signs, let's examine the aging WRs for the 2024 fantasy season. First, we will focus on PPR performance and trends and then supplement that with a look at air yards and man YPRR (yards per route run). We don't want to overstate the predictiveness of the man coverage splits given their low r-squared values, but they are still clues we can use for context.
Based on their current ADP on Underdog, I will share my current approach for each player. We will start with the elites (remember, ages are rounded based on Week 1).
Adams fell to 70% of his prime production in 2023, registering his first non-WR1 finish (15.6 PPG) for the first time since his third season. On a positive note, he still delivered a WR1-worthy 112 air yards per game. However, his YPRR against man has fallen in each of the last two seasons (3.04, 2.00, 1.66).
QB play is a factor for YPRR, but it is hard to get too excited about Aidan O'Connell and Gardner Minshew. Additionally, the Raiders added target competition by selecting Brock Bowers in Round 1 of the NFL Draft.
We can't rule out Adams' return to WR1 form, but right now he is a fade for me as the WR13 off the board.
Allen is coming off a seventh consecutive WR1 PPG season. He appeared to be slowing down in 2020 and 2021 with YPRRs of 1.91 and 1.78, but this was a false alarm. He rebounded with marks of 2.18 and 2.36 over the last two years, and his man YPRR was 2.14 last season.
He is definitely at the age where a sudden cliff could hit, and he will face stiffer target competition from D.J. Moore and Rome Odunze with a rookie QB in 2024. Injuries have also been a factor, with Allen missing 2, 1, 7 and 4 contests over the last four seasons.
Still, most of this is baked into his price as the WR33. I want to stay moderate with my exposure, but am willing to be even with the market.
Hopkins has hit the turbulent era of his career. He has two WR3 finishes in his last three years — which hasn't been a kind trend to other aging elites. The veteran dominated air yards last season with a WR1-worthy 116 per game. His 2.00 YPRR versus man coverage remains respectable, but it is a far cry from his prime years when he averaged 2.54.
With the arrival of Calvin Ridley to challenge for targets, Hopkins will need a big step forward from Will Levis to rebound to WR1 status. However, Brian Callahan should run a more pass-friendly offense in 2024, and Hopkins isn't expensive (WR41).
I am willing to dabble with Hopkins, but his PPR turbulence is a major red flag, so I want to limit my exposure, especially if I selected any other aging WRs earlier in my draft.
You don't need me to type many words about Hill. He has shown no signs of slowing down on the points-per-game front. Last year, he registered his best fantasy finish with 23.8 points per game and a dominant 3.82 YPRR against man coverage.
Hill is at the age where a sudden cliff could occur, but the history of that happening to elites is only 22%. I will take that risk, given his potential to finish as the hands-down WR1.
Evans has experienced turbulence over the last four seasons, with two WR1 and two WR3 finishes. However, that has been his MO over his career (WR1, WR2, WR1, WR3, WR1, WR1, WR2, WR1, WR2, WR1) so I don't want to overreact.
Interestingly, Tom Brady's propensity to go away from Evans and his deeper routes against zone was the most significant factor in his two recent down years. His TPRR against zone was 16% and 19% during those seasons. Last year, with Baker Mayfield, that number was at 24% – closer to his career average. Evans remained a MONSTER against man coverage in 2023 with a whopping 3.37 YPRR.
Drafters are treating Evans as a mid-range WR2 (WR17), a price I am comfortable paying. There is a chance his recent ups and downs are a turbulence signal rather than an extension of his career MO, which is enough to keep me from wanting overexposure. Additionally, I am still uneasy about Mayfield, given his long-term track record.
Diggs has delivered four consecutive WR1 finishes, but his ADP is falling. He will face more competition from younger targets like Nico Collins and Tank Dell, but there is a chance he is the guy to roster in an ascending passing attack with a big-time young quarterback.
The veteran WR's fantasy production faltered in the second half of 2023, averaging only 9.6 points per game, but he retained a 28% target share. However, the Bills' move to a run-first offense under Joe Brady, with a minus-3% DBOE (dropback rate over expected), was a significant factor.
Diggs' YPRR against man coverage dipped below 2.00 (1.88) for the second time in the last three seasons, which is a concern. However, the last time, he rebounded to 2.65 in 2022.
While Diggs' profile isn't perfect, his PPR per game numbers are strong, and his low-end WR2 price tag (WR22) is where I want exposure, slightly above or even with the market. I can't tell you who will lead this Texans passing attack, but I won't be surprised if it is Diggs, so I want shares of all the pieces.
Kupp registered his first WR3 performance (13.5 PPG) performance since his rookie campaign. He was playing through injuries, which was a contributing factor. However, injuries have been one of the leading indicators for aging WRs ahead of the cliff, and Kupp has missed 13 games over the last two seasons.
With injuries in tow, Kupp's YPRR against man plummeted to 1.32 last season. That marks a second consecutive year of decline after dropping from 4.22 to 2.07 in 2022. Additionally, we have the emergence of Puka Nacua as a high-end WR1 option.
Kupp held his own against Nacua last season with a 27% target share in games together, so he could re-emerge as a high-end option. However, given all the warning signs, I am considering limiting my exposure slightly. That is something I had yet to do before this research.
I am looking to limit my exposure to most of the wide receivers that fall into the good wide receiver subgroup. None of the price tags are terrible, but everyone except Amari Cooper has demonstrated warning signs.
